AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Download photo of 2022 supreme court12/28/2023 ![]() Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the decision to block the lower court’s decision, in a 12-page opinion joined by Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor. The court’s stay of the lower court’s ruling prompted three justices to write separate opinions at the time. Republicans went on to win six of the state’s seven House seats in November. But last year the Supreme Court put that ruling on hold, clearing the way for Alabama to use the map in the 2022 elections. Specifically, they said, the state’s new plan packed many Black voters into a single district in a part of central Alabama known as the “Black Belt,” while at the same time dispersing Black voters in the rest of the Black Belt into several other districts.Ī three-judge court that included two judges appointed by President Donald Trump agreed with the challengers and ruled that the map likely violated Section 2. They argued that the map violated Section 2 by diluting the votes of the state’s Black residents, who make up 27% of the state’s population. Voters and other groups went to court in 2021 to challenge Alabama’s redistricting map for its seven seats in the U.S. Milligan is Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right to vote based on race. The law at the center of the court’s decision in Allen v. But even more significantly, the court declined an invitation to adopt an interpretation of the act that would have made it much more difficult to challenge redistricting plans on the ground that they weaken the collective voting power of Black people. This post was updated on June 8 at 4:44 p.m.īy a vote of 5-4 on Thursday, the justices issued a major voting rights decision, ruling that Alabama’s new congressional map likely violates the Voting Rights Act.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |